This chapter is solemnly dedicated to the both sides, but mostly, the judges, themselves.

Let's peruse the judging criteria's structure along formula:

Title (5):

First and foremost, that is amidst the initial fragments that catch the eye of the potential reader and reviewer. Is the title thought-provokingly interesting and original? Is it otherwise a common one?

Cover (5):

Of course, the title plays a major role in determining the book's quality, nevertheless, the second one is the cover. Is it a finely eye-catching? Is it ideally matching the piece of fiction's vibes?

Blurb (5):

Another crucially determining segment about each piece of fiction. The blurb. Is it bestowing the potentially avid reader any futile spoilers? Is it sufficiently informative one?

Grammar/Punctuation (10):

That is one of the most prominent segments about each story. If the grammar and the punctuation are out of place, thereafter, any individual who peruses the story, is going to be fantastically bewildered.

Writing style (10):

Let's not forget, the fellow writing style of the contestant! Is their writing style plain? Is it a phenomenally unique and astonishing? What it distinguishes from the other authors?

Character Development (10):

A work without a character couldn't be formulated an adequate storyline. Are the main protagonist or/and antagonist possess unique character development? Is it a perpetual and not rushed one? Last but not least, is it realistic or otherwise unrealistic?

Plot/ Storyline (10):

Every plotless piece of fiction without any trials for the dear personas is a pure chaos. Is the plot genuinely entertaining and one of a kind? Or on the contrary, it is pretty common one?

Overall enjoyment (15):

As you are playing the both roles of a reviewer and reader, are you genuinely enjoying the book? Whether yes or no, why? What struck you at first about this piece of fiction?

Total Score: 70

Here is also the judging criteria for the poetry:

Poem's Title (5):

Is it a phenomenally original title? Is it ideally matching the poem's aesthetics and the main theme?

Book Cover (5):

Of course, the title plays a major role in determining the book's quality, nevertheless, the second one is the cover. Is it a finely eye-catching? Is it ideally matching the poetry's vibes?

Vocabulary (15):

Each fellow poet possesses an individual vocabulary as it plays an emphatically major role, when it comes up to pouring their very heart and soul scribbling their works. Is it fueled with thought-provokingly mesmerizing words? Or otherwise, it is poorly formulated?

Grammar/Punctuation (5):

That is one of the most prominent segments about each story. If the grammar and the punctuation are out of place, thereafter, any individual who peruses the story, is going to be fantastically bewildered.

Originality (10):

Is the one of a kind poem completely original and distinguishing from the competitors with its own authentic distinction?

Flow (10):

How is flowing the poem? Is it candidly smooth?

Rhythm (10):

Is the rhythm realistically emulating the piece of poem's theme?

Total Score: 60

WARNING:

TO ALL BELOVED JUDGES THAT ARE ABOUT TO TAKE THEIR TIME TO JUDGE!

Since there is a luxurious variety of judges that possess their own particular criteria for their arranged entries, thereafter, don't forget to peruse the etiquettes which are whether acceptable or not for their final feedback:

"First and foremost, your book is pretty tiresome./ The storyline is indeed cliché/tiresome./ The characters suck./ You use plenty of jargons and complex words./ You opt/try to impress the readers with your big/complex words and overall descriptions./ This chapter is being excessively descriptive./ The chapter is excessively long." (✘)

Remember! This kind of an etiquette if you use either of these phrases, articulating your emphatic feedback to the addressed participant, therefore, it is not only deemed scarcely as a beneficial for their story's improvement, but also it is regarded as a ginormous disrespect.

Especially towards their hard work and creativity they have poured their hearts and souls per each precious second and minute. Furthermore, as a judge with that kind of a feedback, comprising a blatantly infantile etiquette, is going to be instantaneously cancelled and being replaced with another claimant to judge this genre.

So, here is the brilliantly beneficial constructive criticism for the author:

"First and foremost, I am genuinely fond of your story. The narration is adequately smooth as well. The characters such as Jane and Oliver are promisingly delivered to the avid reader, who is the one to determine their most relatable persona, or at least sympathizing with. The prologue was well executed to the new/ potential readers, due to the welcomingly promising development of the events that play out. Moreover, the dialogues are pretty natural as I can vividly depict them in a movie. I would like to suggest you to focus on the grammar/punctuation (Using Grammarly or anything that efficiently detects the grammar/punctuation errors and mistakes in the blink of an eye) / vocabulary usage (if it a poor one solely by reading more books in English)/ paragraphs' length (shortening those which are needed solely)/ plot/character's development (if it is incredibly bluntly temerariously and preternatural/crummy). Notwithstanding the flaws I detected in the piece of fiction, yet, I still enjoy it and hopefully you write more in the near future, inspiring other fellow authors like you to fulfill their dream. Keep up the marvelous job!" (✔)

This kind of a comment is not only purely helpful and meaningful to the author, but also it is straightforwardly tossing them what exactly they have to work on more without being crude at all.

Likewise, once the entries are lastly announced, consequently you have a full month to review them. If you are having any kind of personal issues or you aren't feeling like deducing them, don't forget to inform me, in order to be replaced. If you don't judge those 5 works within a month after the respective genre entries' announcement or you don't warn me about any farther struggles that postpone your judging process, thereafter, you are eliminated without an ado.

Last but not least, there is also somewhat chance of the host being a judge in one of the genres, where there is either only one or absolute zero.

For any questions, feel free to hop up in the DMs to chat with me or on the contrary in the comments. Thank you for your attention!