Task 2: Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones in

communication has had negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills. To

what extend, do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Task 2:

Some educators have warned that the prevalence of mobile phones and the internet has a

negative effect on adolescent's academic ability. I agree with this view. Firstly, the wide

use of 'Internet Eglish' is regarded as the culprit of the declining writing skills. One

obvious reason is that young adults may make some grammatical mistakes inconsciously

because of the frequent use of improper abbreviations and punctuation on mobile devices,

and this might pose a threat to their future career where a professional writing ability is

required in most companies. Therefore, many linguists have expressed their concerns that

the instant messaging and chatting on mobile phones might harm the ability of using

formal written English.

Secondly, the poor reading proficiency can be put down to the frequent use of

technologies as well. Compared to the older generation, young people today are cluttered

with different gadgets, like iPad and Iphone. For instance, with easy access to wifi, they

can surf the internet anywhere and anytime to follow the latest information of their idols

in another country. However, most social networks deliver fragment and useless

information, which not only steals time away from solitary reading but also undermine

the ability to think independently, In my opinion, this phenomenon should be reversed as

soon as possible because reading has a profound effect on a nation's future. In conclusion,

while these electronic divices make the communication much more convenient, I am in

the camp that they might affect young people's academic performance negatively.

Ở dạng "To what extent do you agree or disagree?", các bạn có thể viết theo hướng agree, disagree hoặc partly agree , đều ổn cả.
✔ Nếu các bạn Agree với statement này, dùng các ý sau để support: 
+ Nowadays, young generations get used to using keyboard on their phones and typing on their laptops -> Worsen hand-writing skill 
+ With the help of autocorrect function on smart phone and word processing document => People will tend to make more spelling mistakes when they have to write
+ Easier to get distracted => cannot focus on reading and writing or doing anything for a long period of time
+ Texting language poses an untold threat to the ability to use their mother tongue appropriately => decreasing knowledge of vocabularies. Take "Cyber slang" for example.

✔ Nếu các bạn disagree với statement này, dùng các ý sau để support:
+ With the help of Internet => fast access to the most updated info for one’s knowledge => read more online compared to traditional paper newspapers. 
+ E-books can be bought online at lower cost than physical books => they can also be easily transferred across devices and be kept for a very long time without wearing out.
+ Computers help store all of users’ work in one place => much more convenient to read and write
E.g.: For those who work in editorial professions, they all prefer to finish their job on their laptops only

bài 2: 

The advanced technology created by humans has successfully enabled the interconnect among residents in every corner of the world, particularly by popular computers and mobile phones. Even so, it is supposed by some people that the youth's intensive utilization of these 2 commonly-used devices to communicate can probably bring about unwelcomed effects on literature skills. However, whether its demerits outweigh its merits is still a hot-debated topic. To a certain extent, I am discussing both views and giving my own perspective.
On one hand, hardly any generation can completely refute the benefits of advanced techniques on our reading and writing speeds when it comes to communication, especially between youngsters. In the context of a fast-pace society where teenagers have become accustomed to sticky notes, short messages and quick announcements, computers and cellphones are such leading-edge tools with convenient applications and softwares that allow them to speed up their skills of texting and scanning for main contents . Therefore, should young people be much more familiar with interacting with others through smart devices, they will eventually develop quick-witted mind.
On the other hand, today's world also has to confront technological violence. Expertises and knowledgeable adults are attempting to reduce side effects of advanced machines; however, the youth seems to use these sophisticated gadgets blindly, thereby posing great threat to literature skills. Over recent decades, with innovated computers and cellphones, youngsters have found socialization much easier. Nevertheless, due to inventions of high-tech devices, great number of them have been dependent upon cyberspace and become introvertive. They avoid talking to friends, classsmates in person, even spend school-off time glueing eyes to device's screen, living in a virtual world.
Ultimately, every coin possesses its two sides, and impact of modern tools on youth's literature skills is not an exception. Though state-of-the-art inventions promote the comprehending ability, it is suggested that these cutting-edge equipments should be under control, as humans are living in the era commanded by mankind, not by the technology.

Bài 3: 

It is sometimes argued that reading and writing skills of a new generation are negatively affected because the use of technology in transferring information is soaring. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this view for the following reasons.

The popularity of high-tech products in communication is beneficial for children to improve their skills to some extent. Firstly, students could use the Internet every single day for their own reading purposes. For example, some Vietnamese learners searching information on common websites like Bbc.com are more likely to catch up with the lastest news about economy, politics, and sports. As a result, the speed of their reading skills are more likely tend to be quicker than those who do not take advanteges of the Internet. Secondly, youngsters can text messages through computers. An essay  might be sent easily through email by students to their teachers in order to check vocabulary or grammar mistakes, so these learners may advance significantly in a short time.

Besides, young people’s abilities are enhanced by the increasing use of mobile phones in communicating with other people. To begin with, teenagers are able to use native words correctly thanks to social network. If a person often use foreign languages to keep in touch with their relatives who have lived overseas for a long time, they will probably apply slangs and idioms to a letter. Furthermore, school-age children could learn more pratical words. They usually read all the instructions before making  a free video call or signing up a game account on mobile phones, which allows them to understand clearly all terms.

In conclusion, I would argue that the influences of technological devices used to transfer signals on youngsters’ reading and writing skills can be totally positive.

2. Task 2: Some working parents believe childcare centres can provide best care for

children, others think other family members like grandparents can do this job. Discuss

both views and give your own opinion.

Traditionally, toddlers are raised by their relatives such as grandparents in most countries.

However, daycare centres have gained a growing popularity among working parents in

recent years. From my point of view, attending childcare centres has more benefits.

One obvious argument in favor of daycare centres is that they provide children with the

professional childhood education. This is because these centres are usually equipped with

well-trained staff who can impart different skills, such as singing, dancing, painting and

storytelling, to children through a variety of activities dirung the day. In addition to the

well-organised, structured projects, toddlers are provided with more opportunities to

socialize with other peers, which helps them gain confidence and self-consciousness.

However, these opportunities are rare to achieve if they are watched over by

grandparents.

Opponents feel that a relative care is as effective as children centres. the reason for this is

that taking care of a child is never an easy task, as children need constant love and

attention. in fact due to the limited number of caregivers, children are less likely to get the

one-on-one care. By contrast, relatives, grandparents in particular, have sufficient time to

take care of their beloved grandchildren, which also contributes to the family bond.

I personally believe that no child can become an active and valuable member of any

society without intercommunicating with other peers. Therefore, although there are

convincing arguments for a relative care, it is better to send them into daycare centres

during the childhood period.

Bài 2:

There are several reasons why other family members can care for their children simply because they often have much more time than working individuals. For example, grandparents who are retirees after contributing efforts to organizations or companies in long time, so they might sacrifice individual hobbies such travelling, planting trees, playing sports for childcare. Additionally, taking care of their children at home from grandparents can reduce financial burden on the other families, thus parents will have save a considerable amount of money from household balance statement in order to focus more on other planning such make a purchase goods including food, clothing, household equipment and tools. Lastly, when grandparents look after their children, other family members might feel not worried, and they can concentrate on work to finish and deal with better in workplace. This could lead to an increase in labour productivity and efficiency and the accumulation of wealth in society.
Other reasons of giving their children to childcare centres. These places are run more professionally and better by experienced managers and conscientious teachers than let their children stay at home. Moreover, taking their children to schools can help them play and interact with their peers.For example, children can play toys with their friends and communicate with teachers to understand more about surrounding everything that they still have not known.

bài 3: 

It is a social norm that both parents pursue their career paths outside of home, and their children are taken care of either by teachers at nurseries or by grandparents. While the latter option is advantageous to some, I strongly believe nursery school provide the best preparation for children.

There are reasons why some parents are in favour having their children being looked after by grandparents. First, unlike childcare centres, grandparents do not usually demand a payment for their service. To some financially disadvantaged families, this can be the most economical choice. Furthermore, with grandparents’ support, the children-caretakers ratio can be just a fraction of that at a nursery. This means there will be more eyes to monitor every step the children take, to assure them of an environment free of any detriment.

On the other hand, I am of the opinion that sending children to preschools is a more beneficial solution for a comprehensive development. With standardised educational methods, these schools may foster both physical and intellectual growth of children. For instance, children can be exposed to a diversity of opinions and backgrounds, thus develop their social skills by negotiating with other kids. Moreover, at these places, healthy and balanced diets for children can be catered, according to eating menus that are tailored based on the nutrient needs of different ages. As a result, preschool children may progress faster than those who are home-schooled, both psychologically and physically. 

In conclusion, even though some parents still choose to have childcare support by grandparents, I believe that kindergarten is the right place for an all rounded progress of a child.

 Giải đề thi Writing ngày 14/2/2015 – Chủ đề Mobile Phone

ĐỀ

The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

BÀI VIẾT CỦA TỚ Biểu tượng cảm xúc smile ^^

The progress of advanced technology has made a significant contribution to daily communication among people. Nevertheless, there is a controversy that handset devices, such as mobile phone should be prohibited like smoking. From my point of view, in some cases, mobile phone users had better set limits for this device. In other cases, mobile phone should be encouraged.

As functional equipment, mobile phone is well –known for its far –distance connection and the storage of multimedia documents. Thanks to this convenience, people can make easy contact together, no matter how they are far away. A director, for example, can inform his local staffs of immediately addressed tasks by dialing phone numbers when he is working oversea, and as such jobs will be completed favourably. In addition, smart phones are beneficial for owners as well due to books in digital format and other knowledge applications. Instead of storing the large number of documents in personal desktops or laptops which are inconvenient to hold by, smart phone owners will find much easier to carry e-books along with a Nokia or iPhone . In another word, if smart phones are suggested to be banned, we will limit ourselves in terms of daily conversation and information storage based on electronic platform.

However, the prohibition of mobiles, in other circumstances, would help users avoid fatal accidents. For instance, it is commonly thought that calling phones in pertrol station could ignite explosion because electromagnetic radiation from mobiles is seen as the root cause of sparkling. If this device is permitted to turn on, not only does it make fuel tanks explode, but also phone users can be burned to death. Take, for another example, using mobile phones while driving in bustling street which distracts vehicle owners. As a result, they may cause damage for themselves and other pedestrians.

In conclusion, cellular phone has both positive and negative effects depending on where we use and what we work with it. Accordingly, mobile users themselves need to set strict rules for the sake of individual and social benefits.

Tác giả: Admin Xuân Hưng – Cử nhân Tiếng Anh – ĐH Ngoại Ngữ Hà Nội

====================================================

C. Những từ vựng hay được sử dụng trong bài

-Handset devices: Những thiết bị cầm tay

-Mobile phone users = Mobile phone owners: Người sử dụng điện thoại đi động

-Far – distance connection : Kết nối ở khoảng cách xa

-Storage of multimedia documents: Sự lưu trữ tài liệu đa phương tiện

-Inform his local staffs of immediately addressed tasks: Thông báo cho nhân viên ở địa phương những nhiệm vụ cần được giải quyết ngay ( Cấu trúc: inform sb of sth)

- Books in digital format = ebooks: Sách điện tử

- Hold by = carry along = xách, mang theo

- Explode = ignite explosion : Nổ, làm phát nổ

- Fatal accidents: Tai nạn chết người

- Electromagnetic radiation: Bức xạ điện từ