notes
*Types of presupposition
Existential: the X/one’s X >>X exists
Factive: I regret leaving >> I left
Non – factive: He pretended to be happy >> He wasn’t happy
Lexical: He managed to escape >> He tried to escape
Structural: When did she leave? >> She left
Counterfactual: If I weren’t ill >> I’m ill
* maxisms:
- quality: not say anything false or lack adequate evidence.
- quantity: informative as required
- relation: stay on topic
- manner: avoid ambiguity, obscurity of expression, be brief and orderly.
*properties of Conversational implicatures:
- Calculability: every conversational implicature can be calculated from the meaning of what is said plus identifiable of the context.
- Reinforcibility: speaker can supply material that entails what would be only conversationally implicated
- Suspension: speaker can suspend the implicatures by using the expression: “at least”
- Cancellability: speaker can add futher infor, often following the expression “in fact” to indicate the inference not be drawn.
- Deniability: speakers can always deny the intended meanings because implicatures are part of what’s communicated and not said.
*speech act type:
Declarations: S causes X -> words change the world (I declare you to be husband and wife)
Representatives: S believes X -> makes words fit the outside world (It’s a hot day)
Expressives: S feels X -> makes words fit the inside world of speaker (I’m sorry)
Directives: S wants X -> listener makes the world fit the word (Give me a cup of coffee)
Commissives: S intends X -> Speaker makes the world fit the word (We’ll not do that)
*Felicity conditions:
General condition: S and H understand the language
Content con: S predicates a future act of A of S
Preparatory con: S believes that doing act A is in H’s best interest and that S can do A
Sincertity con: S intends to do act A
Essential con: S undertake an obiligation to do act A
*Do not perform FTA
- say nothing or opting out choice (OOC)
- 2 types: + OOC genuine: let the matter remain closed
+ OOC strategic: expects other to infer Self’s wish to achieve the perlocutionary effect.
*Bald – on-record (the least polite)
- not attempt to minimize the threat to the hearer’s face
- shock or embarrass the addressee
- situations: S has close relation w H
* Positive politeness Strategies
- notice, attend to H > You look sad. Can I do anything?
- use in – group identity markers > come here, honey.
- seek agreement and avoid disagreement > no, he’s not a generous man, is he?
- propose or assert common ground > go out w me, babe?
- joke
- offer, promise
- be optimistic: I’m sure you won’t mind if I use your cellphone.
- include both S and H in the activity : Let’s….
- Give or ask 4 reasons: Why not…?
- Give sympathy to H: I’m really sorry to hear….
* Negative politeness strategies:
- be conventionally indirect: Would/ could….
- question, hedge: Perhaps./…
- pessimistic: you won’t go to the party, will you?
- minimize the imposition: “I just want….”
- give deference (respect)
- apologize: I’m sorry, it’s a lot to ask, but you….
-impersonalize S and H:
- state the FTAs as a general rule: visitors sign the ledger.
- norminalize
- go on record as incurring debt or as not indebting H : I’d be eternally grateful if you could come.
Bạn đang đọc truyện trên: AzTruyen.Top