This is my ranting. The source, anyways. It is....HARRY POTTER VS TWILIGHT! J.K. Rowling vs Stephanie Meyer, two of the greatest authors who ever-you know what, no. HARRY POTTER IS WAY BETTER THAN TWILIGHT. WANNA KNOW WHY?

Read this, please! Here are all the things wrong with this. You know what, this information is funnily interesting! You know why? BECAUSE THE FIRST HARRY POTTER CAME OUT ON JUNE 30, 1997. THE FIRST TWILIGHT CAME OUT SOMETIME IN 2005. See, I don't even have the patience to search the exact date. Number two, SO? THERE ARE A TON OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE LAST NAME 'BLACK' AND AREN'T BLACK (Not trying to be racist or anything.) AND GUESS WHAT? NEITHER DID MEYER. None of the characters Meyer created were creative. Rowling made characters with personalities that matched their names. And Meyer copied a LOT. We have a Bella, too! We have a James, too! We have a Clearwater, too! WE HAVE A FUDGING BLACK FAMILY, TOO. And guys, SIRIUS isn't even spelled right! 

Can I just pull this apart? For this person's number one: Rowling isn't spelled right! Okay, 'Siriusly' though. J.K. Rowling had a bigger imagination than Meyer, then! You had four books packed with worthless junk! NOTHING HAPPENED! AT ALL. In Harry Potter, there is SO MUCH MORE going on! So many events that all lead up to the interesting stuff! For your number two: Watching her sleep is NOT romantic! IT IS CREEPY. IT'S LIKE, LIKE SLENDERMAN! This is known as stalking. Threatening people is not sweet, JSYK. It can scare people. Bad. And making people feel bad is just terrible! BELLA COULD HAVE GOTTEN DISCOURAGED AND COMMITTED SUICIDE! Although in her case I wouldn't care. Harry Potter has everything to do with love, and you would know that if you had read all the books, which you said that you had read only two! Spoiler alert, but a mother dying for her young son is selfless. That is true love. LOVE DOESN'T HAVE TO BE WHEN TWO PEOPLE DATE! J.K. Rowling told a better love story in a CHAPTER than Meyer did in FOUR FUDGING BOOKS. 'Always' is more romantic than 'I Love You', to me. And magic is way more complicated than just magiking out of a situation. Arguing is the key to a good relationship, BTW. For number three: NO. JUST NO. YOUR PERFECT EDWARD CULLEN PLAYED A HARRY POTTER CHARACTER, FOR PETES SAKE! Not that it matters, but I am going to pull that apart later. Anyways, they aren't attractive. And just for you, I am going to say it now. GARY STUS AND MARY SUES AREN'T COOL! Being perfect is annoying! It is Mary Sue or Gary Stu! OP! So what if you are a ginger? Flawed characters make for a good story! Oh, and let me say, I don't love these characters. Hence why I am trying to agree with this stupid article! AND FAILING! Number four. Bella isn't independent. Her mother thinks she is. But she isn't. She does whatever Edward says. And she isn't strong, either. She can't fight, unlike Hermione. And JSYK, our Bella could kick your Bella's tail to the curb. And beyond. So you're telling us that jumping off a cliff to see your boyfriend again is a good role-model? Hermione saved the wizarding world, BTW. More opinions, like Hermione gives, are great to have! Cliche, quiet, beautiful characters are NOT. And Hermione can't drive because she can, I dunno, APARATE (Or however you spell it O_o)? Meaning she can just magic herself anywhere? BUT NOT ALL THE TIME? AND THEY HAVE MAGIC FLYING BROOMSTICKS. Number five. Bella does not wait for him. She jumps off a cliff to get him to come back. And he leaves her for her safety. SEE THE REALITY, ISABELLA. And if your boyfriend leaves then comes back, you shouldn't accept it in a second just like that! WHAT IF HE WAS JUST SNOGGING YOUR BFF? Ron was being a jerk, and Hermione had every right to be angry. And think about it, didn't she just seem CONCERNED? Concern is better than just plain acceptance in a second! Number six. In what part in any book is there a tattered/frayed ribbon, an apple, a blood drenched rose, or an incorrectly colored chess set? And Daniel Radcliff was cast for the part after the books came out! IT ISN'T ROWLING'S FAULT! And finally, number seven. Ew....a whole four books about two character's love? NO. And so what? You don't need a boyfriend to be happy! LUNA LOVEGOOD AND NEVILLE LONGBOTTOM PROVED THAT! So did Sunny from Wings of Fire...but let's get back to the point. Having things other than dating going on in your social life is healthy. Yes, I mean it. 

Now, I am going to compare the box sets. The Twilight box set is just the pictures of the book covers, whereas the classic Harry Potter ones are trunks. NOT chests, thank you very much! WE ACTUALLY HAVE TRUNKS IN OUR SERIES! 

Next, our audiences. The worst selling Harry Potter movie, The Prisoner of Askaban, has gotten approximately $1,000,000,000 more than the most selling Twilight movie(I think it was Breaking Dawn...). And Harry Potter is targeted at all audiences, not just teenage girls. And this teaches girls to date men twice their age, not cool!

Now, death. Nobody likes it. But at least Rowling killed off some characters! I mean, I know that she said that Fred's death made her cry, Snape's made us devastated, Dumbledore's was terrible, Dobby's was heartbreaking, and Hedwig's was upsetting. But at least we had dead characters! It made the story way more heartwarming, tear-jerking, and overall better. Meyer said that she didn't kill off characters because it would be too sad. O_o OMG STEPHANIE YOU ACT LIKE I CARE. 

Next up is the BAD GUY(s). Now, Twilight has, what, two bad guys? I don't know, I only read the first book. Anyways, one of the assumed ones in the first book was Laurent. Laurent, AFTER THE FIRST FUDGING TIME HE MET ESME, CARSLILE, EDWARD (Ew...), ALICE, ROSALIE, EMMET, AND JASPER (Is that how you spell them? I don't know and I don't care.) HE IS GOOD. BORING! And then we have James and so-and-so. James just wants to kill Bella for a random reason. NO REASON AT ALL, whereas Voldemort, You-Know-Who, He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named, Tom (Marvolo) Riddle, whatever you want to call him, had a reason. He couldn't understand why others had someone to love them because he never was able to love. Just so you know, it is a little known fact that Voldemort was never able to love because he was concealed under a love potion. 

(But no, I have no idea what 'Naruto' is and have no desire to.)

Now, what you have all been waiting for....THE ACTORS! Not that this matters, and no, I will not be judging them on how hot or something they are. First we have the one and only, ROBERT PATTINSON. Surprisingly, Robert played Cedric Diggory from Harry Potter and Edward Cullen from Twilight. (I know, if you Twihards watched 'The Goblet of Fire' you got sad because you though it was Edward....but I was sad because it was CEDRIC.) When asking the cast how they would have liked Twilight if they had read it before playing the characters, Kristin Stewart said she would love it, as did Taylor Lautner. But Mr. Pattinson had a peculiar response. He said, and I agree whole-heartedly, that he would MINDLESSLY HATE IT (Ha! In your FACE, Twihards!) and that he preferred to play Cedric. And Kristin Stewart...she needs to control her emotions. No, I'm joking. If she had a different facial expression for everything, that would be great. But she doesn't. Just the same blank face as always. Pencil-thin lips, just a blank, bored expression. At all times. But in Harry Potter...(Let me just use Tom Felton, AKA Draco Malfoy, as an example.) the characters have a face for everything. Tom Felton has an amused face, a scared face, an adorable terrified face, a angry face, a sad face, and so many more! Plus, I think that the HP cast was more happy with their roles. Emma Watson, Hermione Granger, CRIED when it all ended. The Twilight cast just smiled, said their good-byes, and went on their way. I guess they were VERY happy with the production of the movie. 

Now, shall we rant this nice article? Let us BEGIN! What exactly was your teacher's face like once she said that your writing reminded her of Stephanie's? And why would you like an author who is flawless? Nobody is flawless! And no, she DOESN'T bring out the writer inside each of us. Not me, at least. And Harry Potter is more supported, BTW, so J.K. probably is liked more. And you just don't pay attention! I only learned about Stephanie Meyer about A YEAR after I read the first Twilight book! And that picture is NOT J.K. Rowling. It is JENNIFER ANISTON. Close, but there is a difference! And Harry Potter is UNIVERSALLY loved! So HA! And about every 30 seconds, somebody starts reading Harry Potter. And she called herself 'J.K.' because she is actually named Joanne, and she adopted her grandmother's middle name, Katherine, and called herself J.K. (She has to middle name.) so that she would appeal to more male readers. It explains why your audience is mainly teenage girls. And you have no respect for others, do you? She didn't mean for her name to sound like JK as in Just Kidding! A friend actually told me that nobody cares about Harry Potter and that Twilight is more popular so I should just shut my mouth...as if. SHE WISHES.

And, as we all trust Dumbledore, DUMBLEDORE HAS SPOKEN. 

And, for further clarification, so has Cleverbot. 

And Stephen King.