You don't have to say anything if you're annoyed of my behaviour, but I'm just hoping to speed up this process a bit faster.

(Besides, I read this over and over again, and I can't tell whether or not it makes sense)

"In the film, this feeling of danger and tension is missing from Scout, Jem, and Dill's running away; the film includes Mr. Nathan Radley's gunshot while Jem retrieved his pants from the Radleys' fence, not while Scout, Jem, and Dill runs from the Radley House. This affects the mood of the children's situation in running from the Radley House. Scout, Jem, and Dill's lives are not as threatened in the film; Mr. Nathan Radley'd gunshot is what manifests the danger of the situation, so by excluding the gunshot from the scene, the film creates a mood that is not as intense. By misplacing a sense of danger in a different scene, Scout, Jem, and Dill's lives are not threatened as much..."

I'm stuck again, but meh.

Bad grammar, I bet, right? Also, is it fine if I just post a bunch of junk about this essay without expecting any help? I don't feel like keeping it bottled in anymore, and y'all might not answer anyways (since I'm likely to ask too much, so therefore, I will expect no answers, accepting though not expecting).

Y'all can hate me for being like this, I don't care, I don't care anymore, if I'm being annoying, fine, don't care, don't give a shit, bye.

I can't believe I just said that. =_=

........

Forget what I said, do whatever you want. (I'm posting random stuff about this essay now, ready to ignore?)