We can solve the world's problems but it requires a sacrifice. A short term sacrifice for a long term benefit. But when short term is longer than the average human lifespan, what motivation is there to "suffer" for the sake of future generations?Why should one sacrifice the jam of today for the "promise" of more jam tomorrow? Who can guarantee that not eating the jam today will still yield another jam tomorrow?What is the individual benefit? Is it empathy?Is it because we know the hardships of suffering the consequences of previous generations? Is empathy enough to turn us all into martyrs? But why should we care? Why not have fun while it lasts and sterilize the whole population? Is it because of religious reasons? Is it because we need others to take care of us in old age? Or is it simply because nobody wants to be the last human alive?

----------

Edit: 24th Apr 2021

Sometimes you have to be the villain to do what's right.

Justice. Morals. Ethics. Humanity... Everything is epistemically contextual. But then, there are those with old souls; those who are well ahead of their time; those who can see the future but are powerless in realising it within the present. All these people are misunderstood, they live lives seeped with ingratitude until the time is right.

Then there are the heroes... the symbol of the Sheeple. The heroes are fools, merely tokens of populist beliefs. The villains are the true heroes - they are the ones who fight for controversy -, however, the path to hell is paved with good intentions. 

But to heck with it. Never was an omelette made without cracking a few eggs! If a martyr has to become a villain or a villain has to become a martyr to get the point across, so be it.

Stagnation must be met with extreme discrimination.

We must live with passion blazing within our hearts, blinding zeal within our souls.

Vive la Révolution!

----------

Edit: 6th May 2021

Civil disobedience should be protected under the "choice of evils" defense.

Civil disobedience = suffragists = nonviolent (illegal yet not a crime)

Crime = suffragettes = violent ～terrorism

Civil disobedience exists because of bureaucracy and corruption: either the bureaucratic process inefficaciously deals with the social problem or the leader does not humanely reason why the social problem should not be dealt with.

There exists the double standards of lawful violence and unlawful violence. It is because the public agree with the social contract in repressing their own rights (without the right to parley) that the government can use force against the public while the public must suffer being bullied. Our current social contract is the same as thugs stealing our money for "their protection services" which we don't want but cannot refuse.

The problem of having the majority favoured against the minority and vice versa is "first they came..."

Exile is ad hominum – if someone does not comply, that is not reason to forbid them from trade and other human rights.